Laws and legislation-the legal route to the battle in the Congo

The Gonzaga Journal of International Law is a practice-oriented online international law journal that is student edited by law review standards.  The journal includes articles, essays, comments, and notes from practicing attorneys, law professors, law students, business professionals, and government officials.  This article was written by Maheta M. Molango, who is an Associate Attorney at Baker & McKenzie law firm in New York City. 

Molango discusses the success of the Kimberly Process in 2002, in which countries with participating governments have the duty to adopt legislation to enforce the Kimberly Process in order to set up import/export control mechanisms, relative to conflict diamonds.  She also refers to various legal alternatives that are available in order to help regulate the trade of coltan to improve the life of the Congolese population. 

The OECD Guidelines, the Congolese Mining code, the Lutundula Commission, the Ministerial Commission on the Review of Mining Contracts and litigation under the Alien Tort Statute are discussed to emphasize legal initiatives to pressure actors involved in the conflict mineral trade including pressuring of governments to protect populations against human rights abuses by businesses. 

The focus of this article is to question the efficacy of legal initiaves taken, and to try to shift human rights laws to hold companies accountable for their involvement in human rights abuses.  For anyone interested in the legal battle against human rights abuses in the Congo-this article provides insight to the steps we need to take in legislation.

Advertisements

About Samapti Rahman

For more than a century, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DROC) has been plagued by regional conflict and a deadly scramble for its vast natural resources. More recently, the global demand for cell phones and computer chips is helping fuel a bloody civil war, resembling the conflicts that developed over blood diamonds in the 1990s. Armed groups earn hundreds of millions of dollars per year by trading four main minerals such as the ores that produce tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold. This money enables the militias to purchase large numbers of weapons and continue their campaign of brutal violence against civilians, with some of the worst abuses occurring in mining areas. The majority of these minerals eventually wind up in electronic devices such as cell phones, and computers. Major American and International companies continue to trade for these high demand minerals, leaving consumers no way to ensure that their purchases are not financing armed groups that regularly commit atrocities, including mass rape. Let's clean up the Congo and take a stance against trade practices that promote violence!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Laws and legislation-the legal route to the battle in the Congo

  1. This iis my first time pay a visiot at heee and i am actually
    impreessed tto read everthing at singgle place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s